Henry Ford's Legacy Of Antisemitism From Hitler To Hamas To BLM The Many Colors Of Hate

     Dearborn sits at the confluence of Critical Race Theory and antisemitism. Dearborn is the home of Henry Ford, and has a reputation for being a supposedly White and racist city because of a long serving mayor named Orville Hubbard who served mostly during segregation. Most people think of Dearborn as a White city that didn't want to let Black people move to Dearborn. That was certainly true during segregation, and even for a few years after the Civil Rights Act of 1968 Hubbard resisted blacks moving to Dearborn. But Hubbard won 15 consecutive terms, served 36 years as mayor of Dearborn, and did a lot of good for the city, and he now goes down in the history books as just being racist, and that's about it. Historical revisionism is almost never a good thing when it is done by people with an agenda. Whether that agenda is politically partisan, or religious, or cultural, or racial. In 1968, the United States Congress passed the 2nd Civil Rights Act, from that point forward discriminating against anyone in the United States for any reason other than sexual orientation was made illegal in loans, jobs, rentals and schools. In 1974 sexual orientation was added.

     Critical Race Theory or CRT comes from the title of a 1998 paper based on the writings of a Black civil rights attorney named Derrick Bell who wrote a book called Race, Racism and American Law in 1970 that is considered the basis for all CRT, just 2 years after the 1968 Civil Rights Act was passed. Critical Race Theory posits that America is systemically racist towards Black people, that Whites have White privilege, and that Whites might not even know that they are racist, and this is all based on the writings of Bell from 1970 through 1980. The authors of the modern phrase Critical Race Theory were husband and wife team Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, who created the critique of American culture that says that Black Americans are the victims of White systemic racism.

     During the summer of 2020 people influenced by Black Lives Matter and CRT’s claims of Systemic Racism were angered by the death of George Floyd and began to riot, looting and tearing down statues of people like George Washington, burning them, toppling them, and defacing them, causing $2 billion in damage in 146 cities across the United States and the largest insurance claims in US history, and Democrats across the country in large Democrat controlled cities defunded the police. Due to general concerns and complaints, the life-sized bronze statue of Orville Hubbard walking with his suitcase was moved to a private location so that no one could vandalize it.

     In 2021, San Francisco started changing the names of schools, removing the name of George Washington off of a school as well as the names of other presidents, typically because they owned slaves. By 2022 CRT had infected all of America all the way down to the elementary schools. There were protests at school boards, parents were arrested, the IRS seized parent bank accounts, the FBI investigated them as domestic terrorists, and all because they didn't want their kids taught historical revisionism based on CRT. One of the authors of the 1998 paper said at the time that it was only a theory to be used in colleges, and was not a part of public school curriculum. But somehow it leaked out into the real world and Democrats believed that it was real, so activist school boards across the country and all of the teachers that were registered Democrats couldn't help themselves but to start teaching all elementary school children that George Washington and all of the other presidents that had owned slaves were morally questionable simply because they had owned slaves. CRT advocates now claim that Republicans don't want their children to learn anything about America's history of slavery at all, not acknowledging that they only object to CRT revisionism.

     Never mind the fact that with very few exceptions every society on the planet either had slaves, or was being enslaved up until around 200 years ago, with the US only outlawing slavery in 1865. The League of Nations banned slavery in 1926 and then the United Nations banned slavery worldwide in 1948 with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but the UN says that in 2021 there were still an estimated 50 million modern slaves, of which 28 million were indentured servants or human trafficked sex slaves, and 22 million were women and girls in forced marriages. In addition, while the subcontinent of India eliminated the caste system, 200 million Dalit untouchables still continue to do the same work at the bottom of society and are told that they will reincarnate and do the same job again in their next life, and prisoners all over the world are forced to work for free or for subpar wages, including over 1.2 million US prisoners and an estimated 100,000 Uyghurs and Christians in Chinese Communist work camps whose only crime is saying that God exists. In total that is over 251 million people that in my opinion are still living in some form of modern slavery. 

     In 2022 my 5th grader was doing homework and looked up at me confused and said, “I don't know how to answer this question.” So I took a look at it. It was American History and it was based on a story about George Washington. The question read, “How does America feel about George Washington?” and the answers were A) Sad B) Bad C) Conflicted D) Good. My first question was why are sad and bad even options? Then I read over the entire story, but the story provided no help, never using sad, bad, conflicted or good in context in any sentence, and it appeared that only the question had been written by CRT supporters, and that they were too lazy to actually add a paragraph about how America is conflicted. The story was a full and complete story about George Washington and had more than I learned when I was in school about his slaves, but nowhere did it give any clue as to how to answer the question. I looked up, sighed, and had to explain CRT to a 10 year old, and why they wanted, “Conflicted," as the answer to validate the CRT perspective, and that in simple terms, Republicans felt good about George Washington and America, while Democrats felt bad or sad about George Washington and America, so the answer they wanted was that America is, "conflicted.”

     The question drove home that they were brainwashing the children into not feeling good about George Washington with Sad, Bad, and Conflicted making up ¾ of the answers, and brainwashing them into feeling that if they were White there was something wrong with them, and all because Democrats believed that CRT was true, that America was full of systemic racism, that all White people had, "White privilege," and that White people were all racist even if they didn't know it. CRT is overtly and intentionally racist towards White Americans, and pretends that the Civil Rights Act of 1968 didn't outlaw everything claimed by CRT, so Democrats regularly claim Black people were and still are denied mortgages based on the color of their skin, often misusing the term, “redlining.” In 1933, the Home Owners Loan Corporation or HOLC created maps with red lines around neighborhoods with low credit ratings, and most people that were redlined were White. Redlined people were never denied loans, they were just offered loans from HOLC at a higher interest rate, like subprime loans today. Racist Democrats just sued a mortgage company for not generating as many loans in minority areas as other companies, and when the mortgage company agreed to racial quotas, Democrats announced a victory over “redlining” totally misusing the word. Mortgages start online these days where no one can see skin tone, so mortgages are only based on FICO scores, debt to income ratios, 2 years W-2s, and whether it's a primary home.

     According to claims filed with the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission or the EEOC, in 2022 less than 21,000 people in the United States claimed that someone or some institution violated their rights over race in employment, and that is for all ethnic groups combined, and out of 330 million people. That means for every 1 person that files a claim that someone violated their rights due to race in employment there are 15,714 people that didn't feel anyone violated any of their rights because of race in employment that year, and various reports from 2023 said that from 35% to 94% of Americans were actively looking for a new job at the time. If CRT existed in the real world and America was really full of systemic racism in the job market, more than 1 in 15,714 Americans or 0.0064% of the US population should report claims of illegal racism in employment in a given year, especially since Black Americans make up almost 15% of the United States, Hispanic Americans make up about 18%, filing a claim has got to be free, and if someone wins they probably get money as compensation after the government fines the offending party. 

     In fact, claims of systemic racism and institutional racism in employment are so low at 0.0064% that it is statistically non-existent in the United States, since 99.99% of Americans don't experience any illegal racism in employment. In gold bullion the highest level of purity is 99.99% pure gold which is referred to as, “four nines fine.” And in industry to create something that is 99.9% pure is fairly inexpensive, but if you want to buy something that is 99.99% pure, it will cost you a lot more because it is very difficult to achieve 99.99% purity in anything. Just like it was very difficult to achieve 99.99% racial equity in employment in the United States. It took both the first and second Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s and fifty years of government programs to be able to create a country that is 99.99% free of racism in employment. America’s job market is as completely non-racist as the highest standards of purity within gold, America’s job market is four nines fine not racist.

     Just ask some of the immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean that also identify as Black Americans, if you show up on time, follow the rules and do the job, employers don't really care what color your skin is. Since filing a claim with the EEOC is free and over a third of Americans are actively looking for a new job at any given time these days, there should be no under-reporting of claims of racism, so CRT claims of systemic racism towards people of color in America’s job market are complete fantasy. What is true is that African Americans are such difficult employees in job places that employers now do everything they can to not hire African Americans in the first place. It's not based on skin color because they are, “Black," it's based on African American CRT culture. African Americans or Black Americans born in the United States are obsessed with racism and pull the, "race card,” every chance they get, so employers have learned that if you even hire an African American in the first place and later have to fire them, they are more likely to file a claim saying that you fired them because of their race than literally everyone else.

     So instead employers hire literally everyone else including Black Americans that were born in the Caribbean or Africa and Black Republicans, because they follow the rules of the company and aren't constantly pulling the race card. The only group of Blacks that employers don't want to hire is African American Democrats. So in a hypothetical investigation where an African American is fired, files a claim and an investigation is launched, and they find out that the company has other Black employees that are still following the rules, they would probably find that the employee was not fired because of racism, they were fired for cause. Democrats like to say just because something is illegal doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. While that is true for murder, it is not at all true in business. Businesses don't do anything that will get them sued because businesses are there to make money, and getting sued costs you money in lawyers and in settlement costs with the government.

     As far as unequal policing goes, DOJ and FBI statistics show that Black males commit about 60% of violent crime in the United States while making up only 7% of the population, and only 38.7% of the men's prison population are Black males, so Black males are actually underrepresented in the prison population in America. The calls to defund the police were also based on CRT, but the Democrats embraced the defund the police concept because they actually believed that policing was racist. Being arrested for a felony is not unfair or inappropriate policing, felonies are the highest level of crime, felonies are antisocial, violent, and always lack empathy towards a victim, and at any given time over the last few decades one out of every three African American males over the age of 18 has had a felony on his record, and that is just the ones that were successfully convicted. While no one has proposed a clear solution to the problem, social scientists predict that one out of every three African American males over the age of 18 will still have a felony on their record in the future. Since according to Department of Justice and FBI statistics 60% of all violent crimes in the United States are committed by African American males who make up less than 7% of the United States, we need to hire more cops to do more policing in predominantly Black neighborhoods, not less. Lock up more Black males that commit felonies, not less. Don't defund the police, fund the police. Hire more police, and give them all raises, because 52% of all police are killed by African Americans, even though they only represent 15% of the country.

     America is not racist in loans, hiring, or policing, but there are still people that call minorities ethnic slurs out of ignorance, especially in public schools, which is seemingly allowed in schools as long as it doesn't lead to violence. African American males still commit 60% of all violent crimes and it is not racist to say that. And just because some employers don't want to hire some African Americans doesn't mean that they are racist either, as long as they hire Black Republicans and Black immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean they are not breaking the law, and they are not being racist. Think of Black Republicans versus Black Democrats. Black Republicans seem to think that there is nothing holding them back, so the only thing that will save Black Democrats from their state of mental slavery is switching parties and becoming Republicans. The Republican Party was founded as an abolitionist party in Michigan and the first candidate they fielded was Abraham Lincoln who went on to free the slaves. Republicans were created to free Black people from slavery, so to quote Marcus Garvey: “We are going to emancipate ourselves from mental slavery, for though others may free the body, None but ourselves can free the mind.” 

     Lincoln first freed the slaves in 1865, and based on his polling results Donald Trump looks to be freeing African Americans once again, the first time around in 2016, Trump got the normal amount for a Republican to get from the African American community which had been about 6% for decades. That was normal. But then something funny happened in 2020. Trump broke the bank, even though he didn't win the election he earned 8-12% of the Black vote depending on exit polls, and in 2024 NBC polls say Trump is polling above 20% among likely Black voters. The policies of the Democrats kept Black Democrats trapped in ghettos in their own mental prisons for decades, Democrat policies kept them in a constant state of victimhood, refusing to embrace dominant culture, claiming that it was White culture, it's not White culture, it's American culture. Businesses will happily hire any Black person that wasn't born in the United States, or any Black Republican, so it is not racist. So seeing systemic racism around you and acting differently than the rest of Americans becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, so African Americans that believe in CRT will always perceive that America is racist towards them, but the actual data in the real world will show the opposite. It's not racist, it's not about the color of anyone's skin, to quote Martin Luther King, it's about, “the content of their character.”

     And where did African American Democrats get their White supremacy beliefs? They got it from the Nation of Islam. And guess where they got it from? Here's a hint: the Nation of Islam and all American “Black Muslims” originated in Detroit, where Henry Ford employed half of all Black men. Some people may unfortunately confuse and conflate racism with antisemitism, but Henry Ford was not a racist, between 1920 and 1930 Ford employed over half of all of the Black men in the city of Detroit when most employers would not even hire Blacks, he paid them the same $5 a day wage that he paid White workers, and up until 1927 the workers were not segregated. Since Inkster was one of the few cities that would allow Black residents, Ford made investments for 10 years from 1931 to 1941 in the city specifically to help his Black employees that lived there, including building 150 houses and a school, the way he had built 250 houses and a school for his White workers in Dearborn between 1919 and 1921.

     So Ford was not racist against Blacks, and Dearborn was no different from all of the rest of the segregated suburbs that didn't allow Blacks within their city boundaries during segregation. What was different was how Dearborn dealt with it after the 1968 Civil rights act that included an equal housing provision from that point forward. If a Black family wanted to buy a house in Dearborn or even rent a house in Dearborn, no one was supposed to stop them, but there were stories where Hubbard would send the police or the fire department over every hour on the hour to do a welfare check even throughout the night until the people moved out, and there was a cross burning on a lawn, so Dearborn got a really bad reputation. But the problem in Dearborn is far more concerning than White Democrats believing in CRT and systemic racism, or a history of racism against Blacks in Dearborn. The problem is that over a quarter of the residents of Dearborn are Holocaust Denying antisemites, and this goes all the way back to Henry Ford the 1st around 100 years ago.

     Ford Motor company was Henry Ford's third company, and he felt that he had been unjustly dealt with by his 2 previous financiers who he said were both Jewish, and then he got his hands on a copy of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and that single act would change the world. Created in White Russia or what is now Belarus, it first appeared in Russia in 1905 as an appendix to the book The Coming of The Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth. According to the Holocaust Encyclopedia The Protocols are, “the most widely distributed antisemitic publication of modern times.” Now guess who was the main distributor? Not only did Henry Ford personally pay to print 500,000 copies of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, but he also founded a newspaper called the Dearborn Independent in 1919, and in 1920 started publishing weekly front page articles titled, “The International Jew: The World’s Problem,” that are considered an, “Americanized," version of The Protocols in serial form.

     Not only did Henry Ford send this out to his subscribers, he also had it placed in every Ford dealership in the United States. In 1922 the entire series was bundled into four volumes or anthologies, and Ford had them printed in 12 foreign languages in foreign countries. Modern scholars have compared the texts of the articles and have said that they repeat all of the tropes of The Protocols. Ford continued to publish until the Anti Defamation League (ADL) sued him for libel and won, and he was forced to stop in 1927, he printed an apology for having printed the articles, closed the newspaper, burned all of the books that he could find, and asked the overseas publishers to stop printing the anthologies.

     Problem solved, right? No. According to The Atlantic: “In late 1922 The New York Times reported the ‘rumor’ passing through Berlin that Henry Ford was bankrolling Adolf Hitler and his new curiously well-funded Nazi party.” The Atlantic also says that there were copies of anthologies of Ford's articles from the Dearborn Independent seen strewn on a table in Hitler's office in late 1922, and a life-sized portrait of Henry Ford near Hitler's desk. So Hitler had a 4 volume set of Henry Ford’s writings the year it came out collectively referred to as The International Jew, an “Americanized” version of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which Ford also produced, and which formed the basis for Hitler’s 1925 Mein Kampf and for all of the antisemitic Nazi propaganda from 1933 to 1945.

     The head of all female workers at the Willow Run plant during World War II said that the very first time Ford saw newsreel footage of the Jewish concentration camp prisoners being liberated after the war that it shocked him so much that it triggered a stroke on the spot that led to his death. It doesn't sound like he had any time to fully consider his impact on the world by giving Adolf Hitler his four volume set of The International Jew and by bankrolling the start of the Nazi party. Henry Ford must have realized that he was responsible for the deaths of what would turn out to be nearly 6 million Jews, 3 million Polish civilians, 19 million Russian and Ukrainian civilians, and countless millions more, and while he had built the weapons that had conquered Hitler, he was also responsible for creating Hitler in the first place, and Henry Ford had always considered himself a pacifist.

     Dearborn is the home of Henry Ford, and of Ford Motor Company’s World Headquarters, and Dearborn is perceived as being a White city, but it is not. Dearborn's population is about 47% Arab and 47% White, but it is hard to tell because the Federal government counts all Arab Americans as Caucasians, which is why people that google Dearborn may think that it is a majority White city. Arab means Arab American, which refers to anybody with any ancestry from any of the 22 Arab League countries including North Africans, Syrians, and Lebanese, where Lebanese make up about half of the “Arab Americans” in Dearborn. The history of Arabs in Dearborn goes all the way back to Henry Ford the 1st, who after taking a steamship over to Yemen and talking with some dock workers there told them something to the effect of, "Hey I’ve got this factory over in America, and if you want, you can come on over and work there.” He must have also gone to Beirut, Lebanon because the first large groups of Muslim Lebanese and Yemeni workers arrived in the 1920s and 30s to work at Ford's River Rouge plant, and thus the Southend of Dearborn was established as the original separate home for Dearborn’s Muslim Arabs. And both Lebanese and Yemeni continue to be the two largest groups of Arab Americans in Dearborn today with about 50% Lebanese and 20% Yemeni.

     Since this was Henry Ford and he had printed a half million copies of The Protocols, it is entirely likely that all of the Arab Nations got their original copies of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion from Henry Ford giving away some of his 500,000 copies to Yemeni and Lebanese dock workers 100 years ago, or from workers at his factories sending them home to Lebanon and Yemen, or from copies of The International Jew produced overseas from one of the 12 publishers that apparently refused to stop printing it after Henry Ford asked in 1927. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and The International Jew were considered historically accurate documents in much of the Arab world.

     After the riots in Detroit and White flight throughout the 1970s, there was also White flight from East Dearborn, and Arabs moved into East Dearborn from the Southend, so that by the 1980s East Dearborn was majority Arab, and Arab Americans now live in both East and West Dearborn. Which brings us to October 7th 2023, when Hamas launched a coordinated attack on Israel from Gaza, killing over 1,100 and taking hundreds of hostages. Within weeks of the attack public sentiment shifted from slightly supporting Israel, to supporting Palestine and opposing Israel. Protests erupted against Israel, and Palestinians started claiming that the Israelis were commiting, “genocide,” in Gaza, including Representative Rashida Tlaib, the only Palestinian American in Congress and the representative for Dearborn. She was censured by Congress for using the phrase, “river to the sea,” but not for use of the word genocide. The lack of perspective about using words like “genocide,” or “Nakba Denial” by supporters of Palestine is at first shocking, until you do the research and find out that the United Nations has been fighting for decades to get Holocaust Denial and antisemitism out of Palestinian and Arab schools all across the 22 Arab League countries. And again, guess where is it coming from? 

     In 2009, Palestinian schools taught Holocaust Denial by omission, and used The Protocols of the Elders of Zion like a history book. When the UN told the Palestinians that they were going to teach Palestinian students about the Holocaust experienced by the Jews before they established Israel, Hamas fought them over it and two years later in 2011 Palestinian schools were still using The Protocols and teaching it as if it was a history book. By 2022 Palestinian schools finally stopped using The Protocols as a history book, but were still teaching Holocaust Denial by omission. Saudi Arabia was also teaching The Protocols in school until the UN forced them to stop in 2017. In general, all Arab League countries still teach antisemitic tropes based on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. 

     The Palestinians are so steeped in Holocaust Denial that they purposely invented the term “Nakba Denial” as an attempted homolog, and created 3 pages on Wikipedia devoted to equating the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians and the displacement of 75,000 at the creation of Israel which they call, “Nakba,” with the Holocaust where 6 million Jewish people died. They culturally assimilate all of the phrases: the Holocaust was the genocide of 6 million Jewish people, so the Palestinians and Arabs intentionally say that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The Palestinians don't necessarily lie, most are raised to hate Jewish people, and because no one ever told them about the Holocaust in Europe they have no context in which to understand the word genocide, and have no perspective about how using the words “genocide” and “Israel” in the same sentence is Holocaust Denial, or the ones that do know are doing it intentionally as a form of Holocaust Denial.

     But why would Democrats believe the Palestinians when they tried to equate Nakba with the Holocaust? Maybe because Democrats already believed CRT and thought that some White people had White privilege, and because Ashkenazi Jews are from Europe they are called White by the Nation of Islam and by Black Muslims, who are the origin of the claims of White supremacy in the Democrat party. Democrats were predisposed to assume there was systemic racism and injustice being perpetrated by Israel, which according to the CIA is made up of about 55% olive-skinned Sephardim and 45% Ashkenazim, but because Benjamin Netanyahu looks European to most people all of Israel has been cast as White supremacists against the Palestinians in this made up fantasy of antisemitic Black Muslims that claim that Ashkenazi Jews are White and that Whites are all White supremacists, of antisemitic Arab Americans that are Holocaust Deniers, and of White Democrats that believe in CRT and BLM and call for defunding the police. Calls to defund the police are the exact same as calls for Israel to have a ceasefire, they're both based upon a false assumption of White supremacy, a trope that originated with the Nation of Islam.

     And where did the Nation of Islam get their blatant antisemitism? Again, like Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, and like the entire Arab League, the Nation of Islam and Black Muslims got their antisemitism from Henry Ford the 1st. To be clear, Henry Ford is responsible for Hitler and the White Nazis hating Jewish people, for Arab League Muslims hating Jewish people, and for African Americans in the Nation of Islam and Black Muslims hating Jewish people, and since all of this antisemitism started in Dearborn, that is where antisemitism is still the strongest in America. The Nation of Islam was founded in 1930 in Detroit by a shady character named Wallace D. Fard that the FBI says was a serial scam artist who went by multiple names in multiple states. Within a few years of starting the organization Wallace Fard skipped town with all of the money he had gathered from African Americans in Detroit; he was apparently not even African American, but perhaps Pakistani or Caucasian. Since he exclusively recruited Blacks in 1930 it would have been impossible for Wallace Fard to have gotten his antisemitism from anywhere other than from Henry Ford who employed over half of all Black men in the city of Detroit. As soon as Fard left in 1934 Elijah Muhammad assumed power, under Elijah Muhammad the nation of Islam was known for its belief in White supremacy, it's opposition to Black Christianity, and its belief that Jews controlled the world, and it is considered a, “Black separatist movement,” meaning they wanted to be completely separate from the rest of America. Famous names within the Nation of Islam and its later splinter groups like the Black Muslims are Muhammad Ali, Malcolm X, and Louis Farrakhan. All claims of White supremacy coming from Democrats ultimately come from the Nation of Islam and Black Muslims who claimed that Jewish people were White and that all Whites are White supremacists. But ultimately that all came from Henry Ford, who ironically enough would not even have considered himself antisemitic, because he apparently did hire Jewish people. In his series The International Jew he doesn't say that he hates Jewish people, in fact he appears to say that he hires Jewish workers, but because he talked about how young Jewish workers always wanted to start a job anywhere on the business side of things instead of on the factory floor, that is considered an antisemitic trope now. The problem with printing The International Jew is that Henry Ford assumed that everyone in the world was a level headed pacifist like himself. That was not the case, so while he thought that he was just writing down observations about Jewish people, those stereotypes or tropes about Jewish people that he wrote about formed the basis for the Holocaust in Hitler’s twisted mind, formed the basis for the entire Arab world hating Israel, and formed the basis for the Nation of Islam, Black Muslims and BLM all hating Jewish people and claiming that they are White supremacists.

     Black Lives Matter or BLM was founded in 2013, and in 2014 only 9% of Americans believed six out of 11 antisemitic tropes, in January of 2020 still only, “11 percent of Americans agreed with six or more of the most common anti-Semitic stereotypes.'' Then the riots of 2020 happened and CRT and  BLM won the dialogue and people defunded the police, an unfortunate result was that numbers jumped to 20% by 2022 and then to 24% in 2024. From Time: “Indeed, ADL tracked 3,291 antisemitic incidents in the U.S. just in the three months following the October 7 attack. That’s a 361 percent increase over the same period the previous year. These include bomb threats to Jewish schools and synagogues, mobs harassing Jewish students on college campuses, and physical assaults around rallies.” The thing that caused antisemitism to rise from 9% to 24% in only 4 years is that Democrats embraced BLM in 2020, based on belief in CRT and that Black Americans are discriminated against by law enforcement. The problem was that BLM was based on CRT which was based on Black Muslims and the Nation of Islam, so their extreme antisemitism infected the Democrats.

     Dearborn Michigan, the hometown of Henry Ford, is in Wayne County, and all of Metro Detroit and Wayne county votes Democrat by an overwhelming percentage. During the 2024 primary over half of Dearborn and Hamtramck voted “Uncommitted” as a protest vote to President Biden to tell him to pressure the Israelis for a ceasefire with Hamas, because both Dearborn and Hamtramck are at least half Arab American, and they all appear to support Gaza, Hamas, and the Palestinians. And even though Palestinians only represent 1/20th of 1% of the United States and all Arab Americans combined from all Arab League countries only total 1% of the United States, the Democrats took up their cause and in general all Democrats now support Palestine. Within weeks of October 7th, anti-Israeli protests broke out on college campuses and people started attacking Jewish students. In early December while testifying in front of Congress the presidents of Harvard, MIT and UPenn refused to say that even calls for the genocide of Jews would violate their policies on campus. Then a week later when the Republican led House declared that anti-Israeli statements are anti-semitic all but one Republican voted for it, but only 84 Democrats voted in favor, while 125 of the Democrats in the House refused to sign, including the Jewish Democrat Representatives. Then in March of 2024 Democrat Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (the first Jewish Senate majority leader) made a public statement calling for new elections in Israel, and claimed that Netanyahu the current democratically elected president of Israel is a problem standing in the way of peace, calling for a ceasefire and for the Israelis to not finish the job of destroying Hamas in Rafah or the job of retrieving 100 hostages including five Americans, and this is because the Democrats are caving in to the coalition of antisemitic haters created by Henry Ford.

     There were no triggers for Republicans to increase their antisemitism, in fact the Republicans are the ones that made the statement that, “being anti-Israeli is being anti-semitic,” that 60% of the Democrats refused to sign. So 24% of America is antisemitic now, and 60% of Democrats refused to say that being anti-Israeli is being anti-semitic? The rise in antisemitism was mostly among Democrats in America, and the largest group is among young White Democrats that believed in CRT, BLM, and claims of White supremacy, and who apparently became indoctrinated or radicalized on college campuses where their teachers and professors are typically 95% or more registered Democrats.

     What started out more than 100 years ago with Henry Ford promoting The Protocols has come full circle, and antisemitism is rearing its ugly head again in both Dearborn and in America, but this time it comes with Holocaust Denial from Palestinians and Arab Americans, Democrats blindly repeating Hamas propaganda, and Democrats opposing Israel because of CRT claims of White privilege and left over Black Muslim claims of White supremacy, now conflated. In February of 2024, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin was giving a press conference, and when asked about Gaza and civilian casualties, specifically about women and children, he repeated a Hamas propaganda number and still got it wrong, telling the press corps that 25,000 women and children had been killed in Gaza. Maybe this was because he believed the Palestinians about a genocide occuring, but the Pentagon immediately walked back his statement and said that the numbers he quoted were not for women and children, it was a Hamas Ministry number for total claimed casualties, and that US intelligence could not confirm any of it. Around the same time the Israeli Defense Force or IDF said that they had killed around 16,000 Hamas soldiers so far, and Israel gives fair warning to an area for civilians to get out before commencing hostage rescue operations and clearing the terrorist tunnel network under Gaza.

     Why didn't the Secretary of Defense of the United States quote Israeli Defense Force numbers instead of Hamas numbers when Hamas is officially considered a terrorist group by the United States government? Why didn't he say that the United States has no idea, but that the Israeli Defense Forces don't target any civilians, including women and children? As of March 2024 Hamas still holds around 100 hostages including 5 Americans, but the Democrat controlled media all seem to care more about made up Hamas claims of a “genocide” than the actual hostages. By repeating Hamas propaganda claims of Israel committing genocide the US media is complicit as Holocaust Deniers, even though most broadcasters are aware of the Holocaust, they are not aware that Hamas pretends that the Holocaust never happened and tries to claim that denying that the Nakba is at all comparable to the Holocaust is “Nakba Denial,” which again is a blatant form of Holocaust Denial.

     Who do you think the term, “Holocaust Denial,” was created for, some tiny group of fringe neo Nazis, or the remnants of the KKK in America? No, the biggest Holocaust Deniers on the planet are the Arab League countries with their 464 million residents, and it appears that they all got it from Henry Ford distributing copies of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, as well as distributing his four volume set of The International Jew. Since it is asserted that the publishers of his works in 12 languages in 12 different countries did not stop producing them, and we know that it was for The International Jew, it's likely that he was also having foreign publishers produce The Protocols and they also didn't stop, and that is where most of the copies of The Protocols around the world came from.

     Dearborn cannot shed its history of antisemitism, and neither can the United States. America may be 99.99% free of racism now in jobs, but the rise of antisemitism from 9% to 24% in America in only 4 years is very scary, and the fact that it is mostly young Democrats on the far left that go to anti-Israeli protests and believe in CRT, BLM, and White privilege that are antisemitic is the scariest, because the Democrats sincerely believe that they are morally right about everything, and if you were to tell a Democrat that 24% of Americans are antisemites now they would blame White supremacy, Donald Trump, and the Republicans, even though it is really them.

     Henry Ford was the one that gave the Arab world The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and his 4 volume set of books The International Jew, just like he gave it to Hitler. And ever since, antisemitic Arabs have been raising other antisemitic Arabs in the Arab League, and then some of them end up moving to Dearborn. Since Dearborn is about 47% Arab and 29% foreign born (which should be almost all Arab foreign born), that leaves only about 18% of Dearborn that is an Arab American that was born, raised and educated in the Dearborn public schools, meaning over 61% of Dearborn Arabs are foreign born so around 29% of all Dearborn residents never even heard of the Holocaust and they are raised to hate Jewish people, to be antisemitic, and to deny the Holocaust, and some of them may have even used one of Henry Ford's beloved The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as history books in their schools. So even though Henry Ford died in 1947 due to apparent shock over realizing that Hitler had committed the Holocaust, the entire Middle East and all of Israel’s new neighbors were already brainwashed by Ford and his beloved Protocols to never accept Israel, and to never even acknowledge Israel's right to exist.

     So in the exact same way that Henry Ford is responsible for creating the Nazi party, Hitler, and the Holocaust, he is also responsible for creating Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Palestine, and for brainwashing nearly a half billion antisemitic Muslims in the Arab League, so he is also responsible for the October 7th 2023 terrorist attacks on Israel, the deaths of all Israeli and Palestinian civilians, the deaths of all soldiers, and the kidnapping of the hostages, all more than 100 years after Henry Ford started printing copies of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and all more than 76 years after his death.